Advisory Council

Methodology oversight by people who don't work for us.

The advisory council is the structural mechanism that makes SilverScore ratings credible beyond our own claims. The council reviews and approves the methodology, provides industry credibility, and offers independent defense when specific ratings are challenged.

Council members receive modest cash stipends and small equity grants - meaningful but not financially dependent. A council member must be independent enough to walk away from the role rather than rubber-stamp a methodology choice they disagree with.


Founding Council

Four seats at launch.

Seat 01

Clinical & Care Quality

Profile

Academic or practitioner who has published on senior care quality measurement. Gerontologist, health services researcher, nursing academic specializing in long-term care, or geriatrician with policy experience.

Purpose

Ensures clinical scoring dimensions reflect genuine quality signals rather than administratively convenient proxies. Reviews risk-adjustment methodology and clinical outcome measures.

Seat 02

Operator Perspective

Profile

Respected operator executive without active operator conflicts. Former CEO or COO of a mid-sized quality operator, now retired or in a board role. Active CEOs of major operators create conflicts that outweigh insight contribution.

Purpose

Represents operator concerns at the governance level without being beholden to any single operator's interests. Their reputation gives operators confidence their concerns are heard.

Seat 03

Capital Markets & Investors

Profile

Professional who has underwritten senior housing transactions at institutional scale. Former investment professional from Welltower, Ventas, Healthpeak, Harrison Street, KKR, Blackstone real estate, or similar.

Purpose

Ensures SilverScore is useful for capital allocation decisions. Provides access to institutional buyers who will pay for the rating signal.

Seat 04

Data Science & Methodology

Profile

Credentialed actuary with healthcare background, biostatistician from health services research, or former rating agency or credit bureau quantitative professional.

Purpose

Defends the scoring methodology on its technical merits when challenged. Reviews statistical approaches, adjustment methods, and reproducibility controls.


Additions - Year Two and Three

Three further seats, added as credibility demands intensify.

The founding four cover the minimum viable credibility surface. As the rating product develops and public visibility grows, three further seats are added:

  • Regulatory & policy

    Former CMS nursing home division official, former state AL regulator, or former long-term care ombudsman.

  • Hospital & post-acute referral

    Former post-acute network executive from a health system, ACO, or Medicare Advantage plan.

  • Consumer & family advocacy

    Consumer advocate, former long-term care ombudsman, or researcher in consumer-facing aging services.


Candidate introductions welcome

We are actively identifying founding council members during methodology development. If you know a candidate who fits one of the four profiles or would like to be considered yourself, please reach out.

Contact the council formation team