Five dimensions. One composite.
SilverScore does not reduce facility quality to a single number. A single composite suffers from aggregation loss, hiding the variance structure that institutional buyers need to see.
The rating family consists of four dimension-level scores covering clinical outcomes, operations, workforce, and reputation, plus a top-level composite for summary use cases. This structure mirrors the evolution of FICO from a single number to a family of industry-tuned scores, and is scientifically justified because each dimension has a distinct improvement pathway.
Clinical Quality
Outcomes that reflect the care delivered.
- Hospitalization rates (all-cause and avoidable), rolling 12-month window
- 30-day readmission patterns following facility transfers
- Emergency transport frequency and distribution by reason
- Fall rates (with and without injury), trend over 18 months
- Wound and pressure injury incidence
- Medication error signals from regulatory and voluntary reporting
Risk-adjusted for resident acuity mix (dementia severity, functional status, chronic condition burden) using published crosswalks from public data where available.
Operational Excellence
The signals that separate well-run buildings from barely-running ones.
- Occupancy trajectory (12 and 36 month windows, noise-filtered)
- Length of stay by care level, relative to peer benchmark
- Move-out reason distribution (planned vs care-failure vs financial)
- Care level progression patterns and timing
- Census stability through seasonal and market variation
Peer-benchmarked against comparable facility size, care mix, and market conditions. Adjustment methodology published alongside the rating.
Workforce Stability
The single strongest leading indicator of quality.
- Staff turnover rates by role (caregiver, med tech, nurse, ED)
- Consistency of assignment: whether residents see the same caregivers over time
- Training completion and certification currency
- Staffing ratios relative to resident acuity (not just headcount)
- Wage and benefit percentile against market
Segmented by market tightness and facility scale. Tight labor markets are scored with a higher baseline tolerance for turnover; the dimension rewards deviation from market, not absolute numbers.
Reputation & Satisfaction
Normalized, noise-corrected signals from the people who use the facility.
- Family sentiment from partner satisfaction surveys (where data partnerships exist)
- Resident-reported quality signals
- Consumer review data, weighted for recency and volume, noise-filtered for manipulation
- Complaint records from state regulators and ombudsman offices
- Regulatory action history and resolution
Review data is weighted inversely to its susceptibility to manipulation. Survey data with transparent methodology weighs heavier than open-platform reviews.
Composite SilverScore
The summary signal. Built from the sub-scores with published weighting.
- Weighted combination of the four dimension scores
- Published weighting scheme, versioned and council-reviewed
- Confidence band reflecting data completeness across contributing dimensions
- Trend indicator showing 12-month trajectory
The composite is designed for quick-reference use (discharge routing, consumer lookup, portfolio summary). Institutional buyers making high-stakes decisions should use the dimension-level scores directly.
Exact weightings, risk-adjustment parameters, and cut-points are maintained by the methodology team under advisory council oversight. The weighting scheme is published at each quarterly release and changes are logged in the methodology version archive.
Return to methodology principles